Cancer Risk Factors Survey on the Development and Spread of the Disease, Early Diagnosis, and Detection with Better Chance of Recovery: A Review Article
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is important to answer some questions about cancer disease. What is cancer? How does that happen? What can we do to prevent it? How is it diagnosed and treated? For the purpose of early treatment, it should be accompanied by the presence of awareness among people, which is the first step we can do. Then if it diagnosed, it should be monitored and treated as much as we can. Later, if the disease continues to progress and becomes uncontrolled, unfortunately will lead to premature death. Therefore, this disease is important to discover in an early stage because it can spread so fast and also it can arise at anywhere in the body and affect people in any age groups, socioeconomic classes and ethnicity.
A review Article Problem: Early detection of cancer often results in a better chance of cure. With this in mind, speaking with your doctor as soon as possible may be appropriate, and screening tests can save lives by detecting cancer early.
A review Article Objective: This article attempts to shed light on some changes that are not evident and do not raise the possibility of a specific type of cancer, as well as to direct clinicians to perform the necessary clinical examinations and laboratory testing to rule out or confirm a diagnosis. Physicians led to a certain type of cancer or its symptoms, although some other symptoms are more apparent and precise.
The method of the article: It is to rely on an analytical approach by reviewing sources, conducting research, collecting relevant information, international reports, and approved statistics to provide important recommendations and proposals for cancer diagnosis, and it includes a number of criteria such as the size of the cancer and whether it has spread to neighboring tissues or beyond, such as lymph nodes or other organs.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Ayvaz M, Bekmez S, Mermerkaya MU, Caglar O, Acaroglu E, Tokgozoglu AM. Long-term results of reconstruction with pelvic allografts after wide resection of pelvic sarcomas. Sci World J 2014;2014:1e6.
II. Balke M, Streitbuerger A, Budny T, et al. Treatment and outcome of giant cell tumors of the pelvis; 20 cases followed for 1 to 11 years. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(October (5):590–6.
III. Campanacci M, Capanna R. Pelvic resections: the Rizzoli Institute experience. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:65e86.
IV. Chamier von G, Holl-Wieden A, Stenzel M, et al. Pitfalls in diagnostics of hip pain: osteois osteoma and osteoblastoma. Rheumatol Int 2010;30:395–400.
V. Geirnaerdt MJA, Hermans J, Bloem JL. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma.Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169 : 1097–104.
VI. Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PCW, Dijkstra SD, et al. The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. The Oncologist 2008;13:320–9.
VII. Hoffmann RT, Jakobs TF, Kubisch CH. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma - 5-year experience. Eur J Radiol 2010;73:374–9.
VIII. Han I, Lee YM, Cho HS, Oh JH, Lee SH, Kim HS. Outcome after surgical treatment of pelvic sarcomas. Clin Orthop Surg 2010;2:160e6.
IX. Hillmann A, Hoffmann C, Gosheger G, Rodl R, Winkelmann W, Ozaki T. Tumors of the pelvis: complications a er reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123:340e4.
X. Kim JD, Kim CK, Chung SH. Treatment outcome of pelvic osteosarcoma a 20- year experience in a single institution. J Cancer Therapy 2013;4:299e307.
XI. López C, Thomas DV, Davies AM. Neoplastic transformation and tumor-like lesions in paget’s disease of bone: a pictorial review. Eur Rad 2003;13. L151–63.
XII. Li S, Siegal GP. Small cell tumors of bone. Adv Anat Pathol 2010;17:1–11.
XIII. Puri A, Gulia A, Pruthi M. Outcome of surgical resection of pelvic osteosarcoma. Indian J Orthop 2014;48:273e8.
XIV. Ruggieri P, Angelini A, Montalti M, et al. Tumors and tumour-like lesions of the hip in the paediatric age: a review of the Rizzoli experience. Hip Int 2009;19(6):S35–45.
XV. Sys G, Uyttendaele D, Poffyn B, Verdonk R, Verstraete KL. Extracorporeally irradiated autografts in pelvic reconstruction after malignant tumour resection. Intern Orthop 2002;26:174e8.
XVI. Singer FR. Paget disease: when to treat and when not to treat. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2009;5:483–9.
XVII. Vanderschueren GM, Taminiau AHM, Obermann WR, . Osteoid osteoma: Clinical results with thermocoagulation. Radiology 2002;224:82–6.
XVIII. Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Jeys L, Abudu AT, Carter SR, Tillman RM. The use of extracorporeally irradiated autografts in pelvic reconstruction following tumour resection. Bone Joint J 2014;96B:1404e10.
XIX. Yuen A, Ek ET, Choong PFM. Is resection of tumours involving the pelvic ring justified?: a review of 49 consecutive cases. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2005;2:1e8.
XX. Zeifang F, Buchner M, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Bernd L, Sabo D. Complications following operative treatment of primary malignant bone tumours in the pelvis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:893e9.