Assessment of Perceived Health Care Service Quality
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article's objective is to describe a simplified method for developing and assessing the quality of healthcare-related research questions. This process involved three stages. The objective of the initial phase was to identify and investigate a scientific field. This field would be used to identify outputs such as analysis units, variables, and goals. The objective of the second stage was to formulate structured research questions based on the findings of the first phase. In general, research questions begin with interrogative adverbs (e.g., what and when), auxiliary verbs (e.g., is there and are there), or other auxiliaries (e.g., do, does, and did); followed by nouns nominalized from verbs of research objectives, such as association, correlation, influence, causation, prediction, and application; research variables (e.g., risk factors, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety); and units of measurement (e.g., patients with hypertension and general hospitals). The objective of the third stage was to evaluate the relevance, originality, generalizability, measurability, communicability, resource availability, and ethical considerations of the research questions. By adhering to the proposed streamlined procedure, inexperienced researchers can learn how to compose well-structured research questions with solid scientific value.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Fandino W. Formulating a good research question: pearls and pitfalls. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;8:611–616.
II. Sheikh A, Rudan I, Cresswell K, et al. Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritization exercise. J Glob Health. 2019; 9:010422.
III. Thabane L, Thomas T, Ye C, Paul J. Posing the research question: not so simple. Can J Anaesth. 2009; 56:71–9.
IV. Qatar National Research Foundation. The fields of science and technology classification. Accessed Oct 29, 2021. www.qnrf.org/en-us/FOS
V. Sheikh K, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, Hanson K, Ssengooba F, Bennett S. Building the field of health policy and systems research: framing the questions. PLoS Med. 2011;8.
VI. Thor J, Lundberg J, Ask J, et al. Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16:387–399.
VII. Babbie ER. The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning; 2020.
VIII. Lofland J, Lofland LH. Analyzing Social Settings. Wads- worth; 1995.
IX. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22:1435–1443.
X. Can˜o´n M, Buitrago-Go´mez Q. The research question in clinical practice: a guideline for its formulation. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatr´ıa. 2018:47;193–200.
XI. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9000 Quality Management Systems–Fundamentals and Vocabulary. ISO; 2015.
XII. Lipowski EE. Developing great research questions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008; 65:1667–1670.
XIII. Ma˚ rtensson P, Fors U, Wallin SB, Zander U, Nilsson, GH. Evaluating research: a multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality. Res Policy. 2016; 45:593–603.
XIV. Abramson EL, Paul CR, Petershack J, et al. Conducting quantitative medical education research: from design to dissemination. Acad Pediatr. 2018; 18:129–139.