The Future of Healthcare Quality and Safety

Main Article Content

Naif Hezam Fahad Alruways
Geza Abdulah AlAlwey
Ahmad Rayan Alfuraydi
Suliman Ali Alhussain
Nasser Ibrahim Aleidi
Adel Abdulah Aldukhil
Mohammed Nasser algdairy
Talal Saad Almutoua
Moteb Khaled Aldhwyan
Satam awed al harbi

Abstract

A Health Care Organization (HCO) is by definition a complex organization due to the intangible outcome of service and a mix of diverse professional personnel. Healthcare quality management is a critical requirement in the health sector. Quality principles have always been present in health care. However, quality is not a physical characteristic of a service. The use of the term "Health Care Service" rather than "Medical Care" further defines the field and positions it as an entity that can be assessed, monitored, and improved. A quality healthcare system is "accessible, appropriate, available, affordable, effective, efficient, integrated, safe, and patient-centered." Practitioners in allied health services, dentistry, midwifery, obstetrics, medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, psychology, and other care providers provide health care.


Quality management in health care is a broad concept. It was initially perceived as directing healthcare personnel on what to do. However, its current meaning is to manage the care process.  It refers to viewing organizational functions as a jumble of procedures and processes that can be addressed both individually and collectively. Despite the fact that various models have been proposed, Donabedian's concept of the triad of structure, process, and outcome remains the foundation of quality assessment today.


Quality management has emerged as a more pressing need than ever before, owing to the new definition of quality, which includes patient satisfaction as an outcome of service. The quality of services provided to patients is critical. The traditional view of quality control focused on defect detection, whereas the current concept focuses on defect prevention, continuous process improvement, and an outcome-driven system guided by the needs of the patients. As a result, there is an urgent need to effect a paradigm shift in the quality of health care delivery. The authorities must take the initiative to become involved in quality.  Currently, quality is being addressed more in the medical field than in allied fields such as dentistry and nursing, as well as in developing countries.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Alruways, N. H. F., AlAlwey, G. A., Alfuraydi, A. R. ., Suliman Ali Alhussain, Nasser Ibrahim Aleidi, Adel Abdulah Aldukhil, Mohammed Nasser algdairy, Talal Saad Almutoua, Moteb Khaled Aldhwyan, & Satam awed al harbi. (2022). The Future of Healthcare Quality and Safety. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio Medical Science, 2(12), 646–651. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijpbms/v2-i12-11
Section
Articles

References

I. Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Menear M, Robitaille H, et al. (2017) Are mobile health applications useful for supporting shared decision making in diagnostic and treatment decisions? Global Health Action 10: 1332259. Crossref. PubMed.

II. Allen P, Pilar M, Walsh-Bailey C, et al. (2020) Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review. Implementation Science 15: 47. Crossref. PubMed.

III. Batsis JA, DiMilia PR, Seo LM, et al. (2019) Effectiveness of ambulatory telemedicine care in older adults: a systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 67:

–1749. Crossref. PubMed.

IV. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, et al. (2015) An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology 3: 32. Crossref. PubMed.

V. Bauer MS, Kirchner J (2020) Implementation science: what is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Research 283: 112376. Crossref. PubMed.

VI. Birken SA, Haines ER, Hwang S, et al. (2020) Advancing understanding and identifying strategies for sustaining evidence-based practices: a review of reviews. Implementation Science 15: 88. Crossref. PubMed.

VII. Boehm LM, Stolldorf DP, Jeffery AD. (2020) Implementation science training and resources for nurses and nurse scientists. Journal of Nursing Scholarship: An official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing 52: 47–54. Crossref. PubMed.

VIII. Bowen S, Erickson T, Martens PJ, et al. (2009) More than “using research”: the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making. Healthcare Policy 4: 87–102.

IX. Brown A, Barnes C, Byaruhanga J, et al. (2020) Effectiveness of technology-enabled knowledge translation strategies in improving the use of research in public health: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22: e17274. Crossref. PubMed.

X. Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al. (2019) Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe: Characteristics, Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Strategies, Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.

XI. Carter EJ, Hessels A, Cato K, et al. (2020) Evaluation of the joint nurse scientist role across academia and practice. Nursing Outlook 68: 261–269. Crossref. PubMed.

XII. Chapman E, Haby MM, Toma TS, et al. (2020) Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science 15: 14. Crossref. PubMed.

XIII. Check DK, Zullig LL, Davis MM, et al. (2020) Improvement science and implementation science in cancer care: identifying areas of synergy and opportunities for further integration. Journal of General Internal Medicine. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06138-w. Epub ahead of print 31 Aug 2020. PMID: 32869193.

XIV. Cheetham M, Wiseman A, Khazaeli B, et al. (2018) Embedded research: a promising way to create evidence-informed impact in public health? Journal of Public Health (Oxford) 40: i64–i70. Crossref. PubMed.

XV. Cochrane BS, Hagins MJr, Picciano G, et al. (2017) High reliability in healthcare: creating the culture and mindset for patient safety. Healthcare Management Forum 30: 61–68. Crossref. PubMed.

XVI. Davenport PB, Carter KF, Echternach JM, et al. (2018) Integrating high-reliability principles to transform access and throughput by creating a centralized operations center. The Journal of Nursing Administration 48: 93–99. Crossref. PubMed.

XVII. Davis R, D’Lima D (2020) Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives. Implementation Science 15: 97. Crossref. PubMed.

XVIII. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. (2006) Welcome to implementationscience. Implementation Science 1: 1. Crossref.

XIX. Ellen ME, Léon G, Bouchard G, et al. (2014) Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study. Implementation Science 9: 179 Crossref. PubMed.

XX. Goodman D, Ogrinc G, Davies L, et al. (2016) Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Quality & Safety 25: e7. Crossref. PubMed.

XXI. Gould MK, Sharp AL, Nguyen HQ, et al. (2020) Embedded research in the learning healthcare system: ongoing challenges and recommendations for researchers, clinicians, and health system leaders. Journal of General Internal Medicine 35: 3675–3680. Crossref. PubMed.

XXII. Granger BB (2018) Science of improvement versus science of implementation: integrating both into clinical inquiry. AACN Advanced Critical Care 29: 208–212. Crossref. PubMed.

XXIII. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. (2012) Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation Science 7(50):

PubMed.

XXIV. Hamilton AB, Finley EP. (2019) Qualitative methods in implementation research: an introduction. Psychiatry Research 280: 112516. Crossref. PubMed.

XXV. Hanefeld J, Powell-Jackson T, Balabanova D (2017) Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 95: 368–374. Crossref. PubMed.

XXVI. Harrison MI and Shortell SM. (2020) Multi-level analysis of the learning health system: integrating contributions from research on organizations and implementation. Learning Health Systems e10226.

XXVII. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

XXVIII. Khadjesari Z, Boufkhed S, Vitoratou S, et al. (2020) Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review. Implementation Science 15: 66. Crossref. PubMed.

XXIX. Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J, et al. (2020) Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 370: m3216. PubMed.

XXX. Lasinski AM, Ladha P, Ho VP. (2021) Provision of Defect-free care: implementation science in surgical patient safety. Surgical Clinics of North America 101: 81–95. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXI. Leppin AL, Mahoney JE, Stevens KR, et al. (2019) Situating dissemination and implementation sciences within and across the translational research spectrum. Journal of Clinical Translational Science 4:152-158. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXII. Lewis CC, Fischer S, Weiner BJ, et al. (2015) Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria. Implementation Science 10: 155. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXIII. Llorens-Vernet P, Miró J (2020) Standards for mobile health-related apps: systematic review and development of a guide. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8: e13057. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXIV. Lu L, Zhang J, Xie Y, et al. (2020) Wearable health devices in health care: narrative systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8: e18907. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXV. MacKay D, Kirkham R, Freeman N, et al. (2020) Improving systems of care during and after a pregnancy complicated by hyperglycaemia: a protocol for a complex health systems intervention. BMC Health Services Research 20: 814–x. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXVI. Mitchell SA, Fisher CA, Hastings CE, et al. (2010) A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: mapping the field. Nursing Outlook 58:

–300. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXVII. Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, et al. (2020) Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implementation Science Community 1: 42. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXVIII. Nilsen P (2015) Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science 10: 53. Crossref. PubMed.

XXXIX. Obro LF, Heiselberg K, Krogh PG, et al. (2020) Combining mHealth and health-coaching for improving self-management in chronic care. A scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling. S0738-3991(20)30563-2.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.026. Epub ahead of print 21 Oct 2020. PMID: 33143907.

XL. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. (2017) Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document. BMJ Open 7: e013318. Crossref. PubMed.

XLI. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration in Policy and Mental Health 38: 65–76. Crossref. PubMed.

XLII. Rapport F, Clay-Williams R, Churruca K, et al. (2018) The struggle of translating science into action: foundational concepts of implementation science. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24: 117–126. Crossref. PubMed.

XLIII. Robinson TE, Janssen A, Harnett P, et al. (2017) Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science. Australian Health Review 41: 291–296. Crossref. PubMed.

XLIV. Russ CM, Stone S, Treseler J, et al. (2020) Quality improvement incorporating a feedback loop for accurate medication reconciliation. Pediatrics. Epub ahead of print November 2019. 146:

e20192464. DOI:20192410.20191542/peds.2019 2019-20192464.

XLV. Stevens KR, Engh EP, Tubbs-Cooley H, et al. (2017) Operational failures detected by frontline acute care nurses. Research in Nursing & Health 40: 197–205. Crossref. PubMed.

XLVI. Villalobos Dintrans P, Bossert TJ, Sherry J, et al. (2019) A synthesis of implementation science frameworks and application to global health gaps. Global Health Research Policy 4: 25.

Crossref. PubMed.

XLVII. Vindrola-Padros C, Pape T, Utley M, et al. (2017) The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review. BMJ Quality & Safety 26: 70–80. Crossref. PubMed.

XLVIII. Wensing M, Grol R (2019) Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more. BMC Medicine 17: 88.

Crossref. PubMed.